Related Links: NLC | Contact | Blogroll | Feed |

 

"You Two! We're at the end of the universe, eh. Right at the edge of knowledge itself. And you're busy... blogging!"
— The Doctor, Utopia


Monday, November 05, 2007

Your OS is no longer valid

One of the things I learned at IL2007 (I'll get to that post eventually) was that "all OSes suck" and yesterday morning this was only reinforced. Here's what I saw on my laptop's screen when I woke up Sunday morning and went to watch the latest episode of Bionic Woman:

Windows Software Protection

How's that for a scary error message. Basically, something happened overnight that caused my Vista installation to believe it was no longer a valid installation. So, I went to learn more...

Microsoft's first suggestion was to run the online Genuine something-or-other tool that validates your OS installation. Yep, it failed. I "officially" have an "invalid" (read "illegal") version of Vista on my laptop.

Then they presented me with a list of incompatible software that I should uninstall. I didn't have any of those programs on my laptop so scratch that.

Next it suggested I run CHKDSK to see if there's any problems with the hard drive. (The theory being that if the right OS files get corrupted Vista could invalidate.) Run CHKDSK, no errors. Next.

I found lots of others who have reported this problem but most of those were people who had been playing with beta versions last year. I did however find a link to a Microsoft page in which I could report my error and get a response within 24 hours. I filled out their form, downloaded the diagnostic tool, ran that to collect the relevant data, and sent my report off to Microsoft. (I'm still waiting BTW.)

Not willing to give up I kept searching and found another Microsoft page that suggested it might be my anti virus program and I should uninstall that. (I've been using Avast! on the laptop since I upgraded and I've not liked it, too slow, so that sounded like a good plan regardless.) The trouble was, when you're running an "invalid" copy of Vista it locks you out of certain OS features, most importantly in this instance, the control panel. So, how to uninstall a program without the control panel. (No, there wasn't a standalone uninstaller to be found.)

Ah ha! I remembered MSCONFIG. Launch that and instruct Avast! not to load at startup. Apply the changes, reboot, and my OS is valid again! I quickly uninstalled Avast! and downloaded/installed the latest (now Vista compatible) version of AVG. System running smoothly again.

Granted, it was Vista that was yelling at me and it's Microsoft's "fault" that their DRM is touchy but right now I'm placing the blame at the feet of the makers of Avast! I suspect that it updated itself overnight as it should but that something in the update was incompatible with Vista enough to cause it to invalidate. Well, I won't be recommending that product in class any more.

Labels: ,

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Testing the Insert Amazon Link plugin

I poked around the Windows Live Write plugins and found a few more interesting ones. This one does an ISBN search in Amazon.com and inserts the book information, cover, and link (including your associates ID). Here's the plugin interface:

Windows Live Writer - Insert Amazon Link plugin

Here's the result:

The code is a tad messy as it includes some specialized MS code, and is a non-CSS table but it sure does make for easy insertion of this content. (From a validation standpoint, it is close. The only errors are no alt attribute on the cover image, an 'unselectable' atribute which MS seems to have made up, and the code itself is HTML, not XHTML (i.e. mostly missing the trailing slash on empty elements). This last one is only a problem since my blog is XHTML. I'll probably write to the author of the plugin asking for fixes in the next update.)

Labels: , ,

First test of Windows Live Writer

Not much to say yet, but the software did seem to successfully detect all of my Blogger account settings despite the fact that I publish to my own server, not blogspot. (One kudo point so far.)

Windows Live Writer - Editing

Also, the interface seems nice and easy to use. There is an edit code view and a live preview of what this post will look like on my blog once it's published. (12 kudo points for that feature!)

Windows Live Writer - Web Preview

Images can be inserted by browsing local/network drives and through a URL. It doesn't seem to be able to pull images from flickr directly, but I can just do the usual copy/paste of the flickr code so that's not too troubling.

Windows Live Writer - HTML Code

There's more features. I'll post more if/when I find things worth mentioning. My initial opinion: a pretty sweet app.

Labels: ,

Huh?

I'm about to download and play with the latest beta of Microsoft's blog authoring software Windows Live Writer and I've noticed one of its "features": the ability to "Publish XHTML-Style markup" [emphasis added]. I'm sorry, but the code is either XHTML or it isn't. There's no such thing as XHTML-style or XHTML-like as far as I'm concerned. I'm still going to play with it but sometimes Microsoft, you make me wonder.
Windows Live Writer

Labels: , , ,

Monday, July 02, 2007

One day your computer will be a big-ass table...

Labels: ,

Thursday, May 31, 2007

One Bill, One Steve, One Stage

Here'e the first of a seven-part video. The rest can be found on the D|All Things Digital site.

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, April 25, 2007

Internet Connectivity Evaluation Tool

Internet Connectivity Evaluation Tool: "The Internet Connectivity Evaluation Tool checks your Internet router to see if it supports certain technologies. You can use this tool on a PC running either the Windows Vista or Windows XP operating system. If you're planning to run Windows Vista, this tool can verify whether your existing Internet router supports advanced features, such as improved download speeds and face-to-face collaboration using Windows Meeting Space."

Labels: , ,

Monday, April 23, 2007

Outlook 2007 Performance Update

Some have noticed that Outlook 2007 runs a little slower than the 2003 version did. Those of us that have massive amounts of e-mail and calendar data just chalked it up to the amount of data we're making it crunch. However, it seems that 2007 is actually running slower than 2003 as stated by a recent, yet unpromoted, Outlook 2007 update released this past April 13th.

"This update fixes a problem in which a calendar item that is marked as private is opened if it is found by using the Search Desktop feature. The update also fixes performance issues that occur when you work with items in a large .pst file or .ost file."

Believe it or not, the difference post update is noticeable.

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

CIL2007: Trends in Mobile Tools & Applications for Libraries

Megan Fox, Simmons College, (fox@simmons.edu) web.simmons.edu/~fox/mobile

  • Patrons want and demand mobile on-demand services
  • Mobile Market
    • [I lost the stats I typed in...]

  • Latest Devices
    • iPods
    • tablets
    • PSP
    • Blackberry
    • m300 smart watch

    • Treo
    • Samsung B470
    • Nokia N93
    • HTC S710
    • iPhone
    • MyOrigo
    • HTC Advantage and Shift
    • Ultra Mobile PC - Q1 Ultra
  • Mobile Web / Transcoded Web
    • .mobi
    • mobilelearn
    • winksite
    • volantis
    • roundpoint
    • mobiSiteGalore
    • Freemont PL has a .mobi version
    • zinadoo
    • NYT
    • National Weather Services
    • Digg
    • PubMed
    • Hoovers
    • Ball State University (Looks like Gopher)
    • Mobile Optimized OPACs
      • III AirPac
    • LibraryThing
    • Ready Reference On the Go
      • Tucors
      • handango
      • dictionaries
      • almanac
    • Mobile Answers
    • eBooks & eAudio
    • Transcoding
      • Optimizing for the mobile environment on the fly
      • May remove content so somewhat controversial
      • Blogger on the Go
      • mobilicio.us
    • Databases on the Run
      • Factiva
      • LexisNexis
    • Mobilize your content
      • via RSS then to SMS
      • MobiFeeds
      • xFruits
      • feedbeep
      • hubdog
      • GoogleReader
      • Text onto the iPod

  • Mobile Search
    • Google
    • 4info
    • Yahoo!
    • AOLMobile
    • Ask
    • [Presented on this earlier in the conference]

  • SMS for content
    • GoogleSMS
    • Yahoo
    • AskMeNow
    • Biblioteche di Roma (answer w/in 48 hours, ugh!)

    • 411
    • Meriam Webster
    • Life's a Pitch - 1st chap via SMS
    • Harper Teen
    • Citysearch

  • SMS for communication
    • Simmons College Reference Services
    • Altrama (SMS Virtual Reference)
    • teleflip
    • gizmoSMS
    • MagicMessage
    • MobileU
    • AIRBaruch
    • Class in Hand

      • Text Feedback Link
      • Feedback Meter Link
  • Mobile audio & multimedia
    • downloadable audio
    • mobile tours - guide by cell

    • instruction
    • story hours
    • video tours
    • mobile tv
    • mobile YouTube
    • mobile Second Life
    • Ball State University training videos & promotional videos
    • Video downlaods

  • Applications for staff
    • Stats - bar code readers
    • Sirsi PocketCirc
    • Wireless Workstation

  • What's Next?
    • txt & video ads (you must approve & get a discount on your bill for viewing)
    • MasterCard & Visa via your phone
    • Hardware displays
      • glasses
      • eink/epaper
      • project to wall
    • ZenZui
    • Microsoft Live Labs Deepfish
    • Photo2Search
    • Thrrum
    • mobile visual interactions - qipit
    • spoken interactions - GotVoice
    • GPS Location Interaction
  • [showing pics from my Library Signage flickr pool!]

Labels: , , , , , , , , , ,

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

Installing fonts in Vista

Well, here's something that hasn't changed in Vista. Get yourself to the "Add Fonts" dialog box and you'll see the exact some screen we've been looking at since Windows 3.1 (or maybe even earlier). The insanity of this is easily discovered when you attempt to browse for the file you dumped on your desktop. You do know the DOS path to your desktop, don't you? Come on Microsoft, why couldn't you bother to update this to use the same browsing interface the rest of the OS uses?

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, March 29, 2007

Bill Gates vs. Steve Jobs

Contains mild adult language.

The Hole - video powered by Metacafe

Labels: , ,

Monday, March 19, 2007

Vista: Problem Reports and Solutions


Vista: Problem Reports and Solutions
Originally uploaded by Travelin' Librarian.
When a program crashes in Vista, the OS attempts to "find a solution" to the problem. For the first time yesterday a "solution" was found to a Firefox crash. The "solution" presented was to upgrade to the newer version of Firefox. A handy link to to the Mozilla site was even given to me. Here's the rub, I'm running the latest version of Firefox; no upgrade is available. Does Vista know something I don't? Don't get me wrong, this is all a great idea but it needs to work in order to be helpful. I was sure to click on the "Provide Feedback" link and let Microsoft know just what I thought of their "solution".

Labels: , ,

Friday, March 16, 2007

Slow Performance From Outlook 2007?

I'm not experiencing slowdowns but it does make me wonder about usuing Outlook 2007 as a feed agregator.

"Adding RSS feeds can quickly swell the in-boxes of many users to more than 2GB of data, according to O'Kelly. He said that causes Outlook 2007, especially when it's running on PCs that don't have large amounts of memory, to write to the hard drive much more often than it typically does -- resulting in performance slowdowns. Hopefully, Microsoft will be able to better tune that part of the software before the next major release, O'Kelly said."

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, March 13, 2007

Save as PDF or XPS directly from Office 2007

I'm assuming this is a result of the PDF format going open source but you can now install an add-on for Office 2007 to give you the ability to directly save your documents in the PDF or XPS file formats.

Labels: , ,

Microsoft Photo Info

Here's one for the metadata librarians: The Microsoft Photo Info download allows you to "Easily view and change 'metadata' properties in digital photographs from within Windows Explorer."

Labels: , , ,

Vista doesn't "help"

It turns out that Vista Windows Help files (.hlp) any more as they're too old. (They've been around since Windows 3.1. Those needing the ability to read such files need to download the Windows Help program (WinHlp32.exe) for Windows Vista from Microsoft.

Labels: , ,

Monday, March 12, 2007

iTunes & Vista - Part 2

Over the weekend I finally upgraded iTunes to version 7.1, the one that supposedly solves most of the problems in Vista. (Notice the important "supposedly" in that previous sentence. Well, here's my results:

I downloaded the update and ran the installation program. (Side note, why can't iTunes update itself from within the program like most other software today. Why oh why do I have to re-download the program every time there's an update?) The first oddity was the fact that I was required to shutdown Microsoft Outlook in order for the install program to continue. I was also running the Outlook widget in the Vista sidebar and I was required to shut that down too. (Oh wait, I just realized that I had set iTunes to sync my Outlook contacts and calendar so maybe that's why...) Other than that the install worked but seemed to take twice as long as it usually did. (More on speed later.)

Once the install was completed I was given the option to run iTunes automatically. I chose that option and waited a good ten minutes, disk thrashing the whole time, before finally giving up and running iTunes via the desktop icon.

I was asked to accept the license (typical of the first run of iTunes after any update) and was then informed that it was "updating iTunes library..." Twenty minutes later, this was complete. (I don't have the largest iTunes library in the world, just 3712 totaling 16.47GB so this seemed to take much longer than it should have.)

Once I was actually able to use iTunes I started to update my podcasts. Every few minutes I would receive an error that said it couldn't update my library due to not having the correct permissions. I continued to click through the errors and once the podcasts were done downloading I closed and restarted iTunes and this error has not come back since.

As for the display problems, some of them seem to have been solved. For example, the add artwork bug has been fixed. However, all of the other display problems do still occur but after a longer period of time than before. According to Apple, "iTunes may display text or graphics incorrectly on your screen. Resizing the iTunes window should correct this issue." However, I've noticed that once the display problems start, the only solution is to close the program (which does then crash) and restart. Any attempt to resize or minimize locks the program forcing me to go to the Task Manager to kill the process. My theory is that iTunes is incompatible with the Aero interface that I'm running. However, running iTunes in XP Compatibility mode doesn't solve these problems and since compatibility mode turns Aero off, this may not be a logical conclusion.

I eventually noticed that since I chose to make iTunes my default player during the installation process, the default player error has not returned.

Finally, having made sure I followed all of the warnings on the Apple site, I decided to actually connect my iPod to the laptop. The short answer is that it synced as it should. The longer answer is that it seemed to take forever to start the syncing process. Seriously, I plugged it in, Vista made it's horrid "bonk" indicating the presence of a USB device, and my iPod appeared in iTunes within seconds as it should. But, it all just sat there for the better part of ten minutes before any syncing actually started to happen. (I've since synced my iPod a few more times with the same wait each time.) My iPod is in working condition and I lost no data that I've noticed.

So, my conclusions: It's better but serious problems still exist. The known display problems are something that need to be fixed immediately. (I'm assuming that fixing the display problems will solve the crashing issues since it only seems to crash after the display goes wonky.) The other item that must be fixed is performance. I now feel like I'm working under water while in iTunes. Importing works at normal speed but everything else either is or just feels slow, especially the sync function.

Labels: , , , ,

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

To Vista or not to Vista?

Ok, so, what's my official advice on upgrading to Vista? I did it, so should you? Well, let's keep in mind a few important items:

  • Some would consider me a bit of a geek and willing to futz around with my computer and change all sorts of settings just for fun.
  • I specifically bought this laptop with the specifications needed to run Vista Ultimate edition and planned on upgrading it once Vista was released.
  • I get paid to do this first and warn everyone else about the potential pitfalls.

So, with those things in mind, my official advice and this time is the following:

  1. If you're going to be buying a new computer, get Vista. (Really, you won't have a choice but if you did I'd still say go with Vista.)
  2. If you have a recently-purchased machine with one of those free upgrade coupons, go for it. I'm assuming you haven't had the computer long enough to customize it too much and you're probably not running any highly-specialized programs. (Check with vendors if you are. Hell, OCLC software had some problems with IE7. Who knows how they're reacting to Vista.)
  3. You've got an older computer and the Windows Upgrade Advisor says the hardware can handle it, don't unless you're a masochist like me.
  4. The Upgrade Advisor says you can't run at least Home Premium, don't even consider it. If you can at least run Home Premium, see #3.

To be honest, I love it despite the problems I'm having. (Second Life won't run, iTunes is fracked, I'm having some issues sharing files between the Vista computer and my XP computer, (let's not even consider the NT4.0 box,) and there's still an outstanding issue with upgrading my BIOS.) The bottom line, is that if everything's running fine on XP and you're considering upgrading everything in the library to Vista "because I can" or "because it looks cool" don't bother. Wait for the next round of computer purchasing and bring it into your system then. You'll be much better off in the long run.

Labels: , , , , ,

Great new features in Outlook 2007

Great new features in Outlook 2007

Labels: ,

Tuesday, February 06, 2007

iTunes and Windows Vista

VistaiPodAccording to Apple, Inc. the current version of iTunes is bascially incompatible with Windows Vista. The document describing the problems offers several "solutions" for those that insist on upgrading to Vista before an updated "Vista compatible" version of iTunes is released. Worst case scenario: "Ejecting an iPod from the Windows System Tray using the "Safely Remove Hardware" feature may corrupt your iPod. To always safely eject an iPod, choose Eject iPod from the Controls menu within iTunes." Apple is also offering an iTunes Repair Tool for Vista 1.0 that will also supposedly solve some problems.

IMHO this is totally unacceptable. Vista has been gold since something like early December yet Apple has yet to solve the problem. I'm glad I ran across this before upgrading as I run my iPod off the same laptop I'll be upgrading. Hopefully, Apple will release the updated version in the next two weeks before I get the time to install Vista.

Labels: , , , , ,

Upgrading to Office 2007

Office 2007 0018 Originally uploaded by Travelin' Librarian.
I've upgraded my laptop to Office 2007 Professional. I've not yet had a chance to play with it much but I did document the upgrade. Click on the image to the right for the complete slideshow.

Labels:

Monday, February 05, 2007

Vista? Mac?


Vista? Mac?
Originally uploaded by Travelin' Librarian.
It looks like Apple is jumping on the Vista bandwagon, just not in the way Microsoft would hope for.

Labels: , ,

Vista & Office 2007

Vista Ultimate & Office Professional 2007They've arrived! I'll be upgrading my TabletPC but I may end up waiting a little while as my laptop is my only computer for the next two weeks. In the mean time, I could download and read the Vista release notes...

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

An open letter to the members and customers of the Friends of the Aurora Public Library

IE6 users, if you can't see the whole post try reading it at the alternative location or use this as a great opportunity to update to IE7.

In January 2006 I was asked by the then FAPL board president to take over as the manager of the FAPL Book Outlet. I accepted the position and in the past year many changes have been made. Many of you have liked the changes, a good number have come to accept the changes, and a few of you still do not like most or any of them. Then came the recent sale at the central library and additional complaints have been received. This letter is both an explanation and a response to the criticisms I’ve received over the past thirteen months.

First, just a little about my background to help you in understanding where I’m coming from. I currently hold a masters degree in library science and teach computers and the Internet to librarians across an eleven-state region. I have also been a member of the board of trustees of the Aurora Public Library for the past four years. Prior to my present career, I was a bookseller (from clerk to management) for more than ten years (in both independent and chain bookstores), and have been a book collector for more than 25 years. I am by no means an expert in books but I feel that my knowledge of the trade is well above that of the typical book buyer.

When I was brought in as the new manager the store had recently moved to its current location at nearly triple the space of the previous location and at more than double the rent. (Even this amount is at a significant discount as we’re sub-leasing from the city and they’re giving us a great deal.) Our books were shelved by price, not by category, placing books of the same genre/ topic in as many as five different locations in the store. Some of the books were priced using stickers while others were priced by drawing stripes or other symbols on the bottom of the books with permanent markers. (Both of these methods reduced the book’s value significantly.) Ultimately, sales at the store had stagnated.

Before deciding how to address these issues I had to clarify the mission of the Friends. That mission is to, at its essence, make money to support the Aurora Public Library. With sales at a stand still, increased costs, and the difficulties customers (and staff) were having finding what they wanted, I set about making some significant changes in how the store was run and organized.

The two areas that customers noticed the most were the reorganizing of the books out on the floor and the way books were priced. In the first case, over a two-day period several volunteers moved nearly every single book in the store so that books of the same genre/topic were shelved together. Paperbacks and hard covers were still shelved separately, but no longer were there paperback romances in four locations in the store. The result was not perfect on the first try and as recently as four months ago we were still moving some sections around to shelve in a way that works best for both the customers and the staff.

The second change, pricing, was more difficult for many, staff included, to accept. About a dozen volunteers spent three days, writing a price, category, and date into every book in the store. The category and date make both shelving new and removing old stock easier on the staff. Having the price in virtually the same location in every book makes things much easier for the customers than the old system of different locations and/or markings on the books. This is a standard practice in the used book trade as it does not reduce the value of the book.

The actual prices of the book is where the largest number of complaints have come from and in many cases those that have not liked the new pricing fall into one of three camps: those that don’t like increases in prices in general, those that want the store to be something it no longer is, and used book dealers. Let me respond to each one of these in turn.

Even I fall into the first category: those that don’t like price increases in general. When people started noticing that we increased our prices they commented on it to me and the staff. Once we explained that our rent had more than doubled most people understood and didn’t comment further.

Those that want the store to be what it no longer is, is a harder category. There are generally three types of used book stores: exchanges, used, and rare/antiquarian. Stores run by Friends groups tend to be in the first category; the store has stock that it’s trying to sell of cheap and fast, usually having some sort of flat-rate pricing scheme. That is what the Book Outlet was but I felt we could be more than that. Used book stores have cheap books, mid-priced books, and expensive books with more varied pricing. Rare/antiquarian book stores specialize in the obscure and the expensive. What I’ve attempted to do is to move the Book Outlet away from the exchange model to the used model. Folks in this category loved the cheap prices of the old model and don’t appreciate the slightly higher prices of the current model.

The reason for moving to the used model takes me back to the mission of the Friends: to make money to support the Aurora Public Library. With this new model both sales and income have increased despite the additional costs of the new location, and because of this we were able to totally fund the 2006 summer reading program to the tune of $27,000 in addition to funding other programs and library remodeling efforts. I understand the folks who liked the old exchange model, but continuing to use that model would just not allow us to support the library as much as we would like.

As for dealers; for years we have been selling books to area dealers and have enjoyed doing so. We also look forward to continuing to do so in the future. However, in the past we were not exactly smart about doing so. Frequently we would hear stories of dealers buying books from us for less than a dollar and reselling it in their store for $20, $50, or sometimes more than $100. (Once or twice a dealer would come back to the store and give us additional money from part of the profit he’d made off the resale of one of our books.) To make myself clear, we don’t mind dealers buying from us and reselling in their stores. However, selling to them a book for $2.00 and having them make a $98 profit, does a serious disservice to our mission when instead we could sell it for $25 and have them make a $75 profit. This way, we’re a little happier and the dealers are only a little less happy.

This leads me to the next issue: our use of the Internet to price some of our stock. Yes, I will admit that when we find a book that we feel might be worth more than a few dollars we use the site bookfinder.com to guide us to an appropriate sale price. Whenever we do this we take into consideration many things including, but not limited to: the condition of our copy, the condition of copies for sale online, the number of copies for sale online, and the asking prices of the online copies. In most cases we end up pricing the book using our normal pricing guidelines. If we do end up marking up the price based on what we found online, we ultimately keep this fact in mind: all of our books are donations and therefore whatever we get for the book we can consider “profit”. In other words, unlike other book dealers we don’t have to make back what we paid for the book in the first place since we didn’t pay anything for it. So, with that in mind, we generally price the book lower than what is being asked for online.

Even then, the vast majority of our books in the store are not priced this way. Those in the locked cabinet and some of the books on the bookshelves at the front of the store are the result of Internet-based pricing, but that is a small minority compared to the rest of the books in the store.

***

Now, as for this past weekend’s sale at the central library, there were two complaints that were heard by both me and the other volunteers: the sale “wasn’t what I expected” and the books were “overpriced”. Again, please allow me to respond.

I believe that both of these complaints are connected as the second is a result of the first. What most people expect when they see that a friends group is holding a book sale is the traditional annual book sale with lots of cheap books that the friends are trying to sell off quickly. (We have the Book Outlet so we don’t do that sort of sale.) However, what we advertised was a sale of “rare, collectible, and used” books also stating a price range of “40 cents to several hundred dollars.” We did our best to make sure that this was stated in all the advertising we did. Unfortunately, despite these statements, some still expected the more traditional friends book sale with a majority of cheap books.

More than 75% of the books at the sale were from a single donated collection of mostly history and cookbooks. Some of these books were not worth as much as others but many were worth more than the usual $1-4 prices we charge in the store. A group of about a dozen volunteers spent more than six months valuing and pricing the books using the previously mentioned Internet-based method. We all did our best to keep the prices reasonable based on the research we performed. Remember, our mission is to make money to support the library, not sell off a valuable collection of books for pennies on the dollar.

In one case a customer came up to one of the volunteers and asked if the $2 price we had on the book was correct since the book was worth $500. In another, a dealer, toward the end of the sale pulled out a single book from his $375 purchase and pointed out that the $100 we were asking for the book was what he could get for it in his store and could he have it for a little less. We talked and I lowered the price of the book for him. In the first case a customer got a great deal, in the second a professional dealer validated the price we had set on the book. These two situations show me that we priced most of our books correctly, just not at the level that people expected.

Additionally some read the e-mail about extending the hours of the sale through Monday morning and offering most of the books at 50% discount as a sign that this was more of a traditional sale at which we were trying to “dump what was left”. This is incorrect. The extension of the sale and the discount was not planned. It was a decision I made on the spot based on a number of factors including the fact that we could have the library’s room an extra day and the poor weather on Sunday. Had either of those not have happened the Monday extension and discount may not have occurred.

In the end the sale made just short of $6000 which will all go to benefit the library. The books that are left over from the sale will not be disposed of, they will be dealt with as any other book we have in one of several ways. Many will end up being offered for sale in the store, some of the prices will be reduced, while others will be offered for sale online. Others, the lower priced ones, will be sold off to designers for use in show homes.

Overall, everyone involved in the planning, organization, and implementation of the sale believes it was a success.

***

The February FAPL board meeting will be my last. At that meeting I will be ending my tenure as the Book Outlet manager as I am moving to Lincoln, NE for a new job. I have enjoyed this position and I’m honored to have been able to support my library in this way. The reigns will be handed over to someone else who I hope will continue taking the store into the future and continue to fulfill the store’s mission. I appreciate the time you’ve taken to indulge me and if you wish to leave any comments please feel free to do so via the comments link at the end of this post.

Labels: , ,

Saturday, January 06, 2007

Ultimate List of Free Windows Software from Microsoft

Microsoft offers a lot of free Windows software, some of which is rather useful. The trouble is that finding it on the Microsoft site can be daunting unless you know exactly what you're looking for. Well, here's a page from The Road to Know Where blog listing all of them with appropriate links.

Labels: ,

Wednesday, January 03, 2007

Office 2007

Here's an interesting bit from the 2007 Microsoft Office release system requirements:

Grammar and contextual spelling in Word is not turned on unless the machine has 1 GB memory.

Labels:

Thursday, November 09, 2006

Vista has been released to manufactures

What does this mean. Well, it means that shortly you will be able to purchase computers with Vista pre-installed. Those wishing to purchase Vista to upgrade existing hardware will need to wait until 30 January 2007. Here's Microsoft's official Q&A regarding the release and Paul Thurrott's full review from his Windows Super Site.

Labels: , ,

Monday, November 06, 2006

Free online file conversion

This morning David Lee King pointed me to Zamzar.com by saying "Zamzar is cool". With a recommendation like that how could I not take a look?

Step one is to go to Zamzar.com. You may want to look at their list of convertible file types before you get to far.

Zamzar 01

Once you've decided what file you're going to convert, just click the Browse button and select your file. (There is an upload limit of 100MB per file.)

Zamzar 02

The file you've chosen to convert will appear at the bottom of the page. You can remove that file if you choose the wrong one, or add other files to be converted as a batch. (Be sure to only choose files of the same general type, such as video files, as you'll only be able to have one output file type.)

Step two is to choose which format you want the file converted to from the dropdown list. (This list will populate with only valid conversion formats.)

Zamzar 03

Step three: enter your e-mail address, (a link to the converted files will be sent to this e-mail address,) then click the Convert button.

Zamzar 04

You'll then be asked to confirm your choices by clicking OK...

Zamzar 05

...and your file(s) will be uploaded to the server for conversion. A status bar will keep you up-to-date with the progress and estimated time remaining of the upload process.

Zamzar 06

Once the upload is complete you will be told as such and reminded that the link to the converted file will be e-mailed to you.

Zamzar 07

A few minutes later (in my experiences) you will receive and e-mail with a link to the converted file.

Zamzar 08

However, this is not a link to the file itself, but to a Web page with the file link. So, do not right-click and select Save as on this link. Just click the link and open the Zamzar.com page for your converted file.

Zamzar 09

On this page, click the Download Now button to initiate your download and then confirm to your browser that you wish to save this file.

Zamzar 10

Zamzar 11

In this example I converted a Flash Video file (.flv) from YouTube (yes, there are ways to download YouTube videos) into a Windows .avi file. Here are the properties of both the original and converted files.

Zamzar 12

Yes, in this case I converted a smaller file into a larger file. However, with an .avi file I can burn it to DVD video and/or play it in Windows Media Player which allows me to view it in full-screen mode. (Neither of which I can do with a .flv file.)

As you can see below, the quality of the converted file is not noticeably different from the original.

Zamzar 13
Original

Zamzar 14
Converted

With this one experiment I can say that Zamzar does live up it its promises and should be bookmarked by anyone who might ever need to convert files from one format to another. The only two downsides I can fine is the 100MB limit, which should only be an issue for those looking to convert video files, and its current inability to deal with files from Microsoft Works (something that would be very useful to public libraries.)

Labels: , , , ,

Tuesday, October 24, 2006

IL2006: Tuesday Keynote

Clifford LynchClifford Lynch, Executive Director, Coalition of Networked Information
Challenges of Cyberinfrastructure & Choices for Libraries
9:00-9:45am

  • Will not be doing a musical performance this morning
  • Observations about scholarship/teaching/learning are changing & implications of policy changes
  • What do these changes open up for librarians?
  • Cyberinfrastructure
    • most of rest of the world you can talk to people about e-science
    • practice of science has been transformed by
      • high performance computation
      • high performance networking
      • large scalle management/org/reuse of data
    • 2002 report, Atkins commission, how is science & engineering in the US changing
      • what changes need to be made?
      • "cyberinfrastructure"
      • data management
      • data visualization
      • people!
    • National Virtual Observatories
      • People not interested in IP issues w/ astronomy
      • metadata is free/bulit-in to observational equipment
      • enormous sky sruveys patch together from many different sources
      • no longer about getting observational time
      • algorhythms are being written to analyze data instead of needing more observational data
      • opens up astronomy to school kids
      • [I read about the democratization of astronomy in The Long Tail last night...]
    • how do we get data resued and preserved?
    • how do we assist the scientists to mark this data consistently?
    • first focused on engineering
    • all of this technology can also be applied to the humanities and the social sciences
    • american council of learned societies report coming out soon on this issue
      • these approaches need to be used in not just the hard sciences
    • there are controversies about whether these technologies are changing the way humanites are studied
    • "phisics changes one funeral at a time"
    • questions
      • human subjects
      • privacy
      • intellectual property
      • access to evidence
    • Could we digitize all the literature of all the cultures that have ever existed? Images?
    • Mass digitization projects
      • Microsoft
      • Google
      • European Digital Library
    • What about the "non-published" stuff? (Museums)
      • what are the roles and responsibilites of museums of publically stored materials?
      • Most stuff is pre-1923 / out of copyright
      • they're monitizing those items
      • seems inappropriate to some
      • "public trust"
      • digitize materials to make them available to the society at large
    • Special collections
      • papers of persons and institutions
      • important to researchers
      • collections are changing in character / going digital
      • Salman Rushdie's papers & e-mail
      • items are being created in digital form
    • Problem of scale
      • study of older times, there's a paucity of evidence
      • modern times, too much information
  • What's coming out of this
    • needs are shifting from getting the tech to work to informatics
      • organize data
      • backup data
      • confidentiality
    • tend to focus on big projects
      • large projects
      • large teams
      • highly organized
      • big $
    • what about the projects with small groups working on small issues
      • small staff
      • small $
      • how we support these people
    • deal with on a diciplinary basis or institutional basis?
      • Will end up with a patchwork of solutions to this problem
      • will be dynamic not static
      • fashions, interests and budgets wax & wane
  • Roles of libraries in all this
    • big research universities & info tech workforce 15yrs ago vs now
      • then: worked for central IT
      • now: more than half now in departments, schools, labs, etc. / closer to researchers & teachers
    • facing demands for data curration
      • more want to share & reuse data
      • shifting norms re: information sxchange
      • retiring faculty / what to do with all this data i've accumulated?
    • institutions finding that there's "value" to the data
      • data mgt & sharing plan in grant proposals
      • how will it be preserved
      • how will it be shared
      • institutions making sure that these rules are adhered to
      • data lost in gulf disasters of last year
        • was there backups?
    • ACRL report on all this due out soon
  • who's supposed to be doing the work?
    • new professional
      • mythological
      • "data scientist"
    • what do these people need to know
      • general?
      • diciplinary?
    • can we do this for each dicipline or more generalists or hybrid
    • major workforce issues
    • sale of problem is large
    • we're going to need a lot of people to work on this
    • are these people librarians?
  • libraries as institutions
    • big research libraries
      • most profoundly changed already
      • strugging to keep up w/ amount of data via budgets
      • access issues
      • main role has been to apy for journals
      • journals now electronic
      • access has shifted out of the library
      • some people therefore believe access to these sources is free
      • policy choices?
        • already overstressed, can't deal with it
        • humanities strategy, hard sciences are on their own
        • need to move resource away from published lit & into more active engagement with the scholarly process
      • three very different pathways
      • different institutions will take different paths
      • movement into more inter-institutional collaboration
      • rapid rise of virtual organizations
        • cross multiple boundaries
    • other libraries
      • huge demand for access
      • will see in many different areas
        • undergrads
        • k-12
      • will effect many libraries
  • Nature of personal history is changing
    • issue for any cultural memory orgainzation, not just libraries
    • scope of those interests are getting broader
    • rise of amature observational science
      • bottany
      • astronomy
      • biology
      • geology
    • libraries of all types need to be mindful of all the changes this type of research is bringing
      • will force strategic change

Labels: ,

Thursday, October 19, 2006

Internet Explorer 7 released

For those that don't want to wait for IE7 to show up via Windows Update, you can now download it directly from the Microsoft site. (You've been warned in the past but now it's cofirmed: It won't work on anything less than XPsp2.)

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, October 18, 2006

Get ready for Internet Explorer 7

I just got this from Microsoft in my e-mail. I'm reproducing it for the benefit of others. (Hopefully Microsoft won't sure me for it.)
Important note from Microsoft. Please review the action items and contents of this bulletin.

Overview

Microsoft will release the final version of Internet Explorer 7 (English) in October 2006. Internet Explorer 7 (IE7 ) provides significant enhancements in security, platform management, and usability. Microsoft recommends that all genuine Windows customers install this upgrade.

Shortly after it is released, Microsoft will distribute IE7 as a high-priority update through Automatic Updates to help consumers become more secure and up-to-date. However, to ensure that customers are prepared to upgrade, IE7 will not install without user consent. Microsoft recognizes that, as part of a managed deployment plan, some organizations may wish to block users from receiving IE7 through Automatic Updates and is providing an IE7 Blocker Toolkit.

IE7 runs on Windows XP Service Pack 2, Windows XP Professional x64 Edition, and Microsoft Windows Server 2003. This announcement provides an overview of Microsoft resources and recommended actions that IT administrators should take to ensure their company's Web sites are ready for IE7 and that their browser-based applications will continue to work seamlessly with IE7.

This announcement updates previous information about Automatic Updates delivery released on July 26, 2006. For more information about IE7, please visit http://www.microsoft.com/technet/updatemanagement/
windowsupdate/ie7announcement.mspx
, or contact your Microsoft sales or support account representative.


Key Delivery Details
October 2006 - target date for IE7 (English)
November 1, 2006 - date by which customers wishing to block Automatic Updates delivery of IE7 should have blocking measures in place
Note: Product quality will determine the final release date.

Call-to-Action for IT Administrators
To prepare for the release of IE7 in October and subsequent distribution through Automatic Updates, customers should:
1.
Use the IE7 Readiness Toolkit to prepare for the release of IE7
2.
Test and resolve any issues with their Web sites and applications using the Microsoft Application Compatibility Toolkit 5.0 (ACT 5.0).
3.
Determine if their organization is ready for IE7 or needs to delay deployment. Find information on deploying the nonexpiring IE7 Blocker Toolkit on our Web site.

About the Automatic Updates Delivery Process
To help minimize disruption, automatic delivery of IE7 includes the following provisions:
1.
Automatic Updates will notify users that an upgrade to Internet Explorer is available prior to starting installation.
2.
IE7 will not install until a user who is a local administrator accepts the update. (Users may also choose to decline installation or ask to be reminded to install later.)
3.
Microsoft has made available the IE7 Blocker Toolkit, which allows IT administrators to prevent users from receiving IE7 as a high-priority update from Automatic Updates and the Windows Update and Microsoft Update sites.
4.
Users will be able to roll back to Internet Explorer 6 by removing IE7 through the Windows Control Panel Add/Remove Programs utility.
Find additional details and screenshots of the notification process on our Web site.

Options for Blocking Automatic Delivery
Microsoft recognizes that organizations may wish to postpone deployment of IE7 (for example, to allow time for user training or additional testing of browser-based internal applications and Web sites). Organizations using Automatic Updates to keep their unmanaged computers current can take one or more of the following steps to prevent users from automatically receiving IE7:
1.
Download and deploy the IE7 Blocker Toolkit. The nonexpiring Blocker Toolkit includes both a Group Policy template and a script that sets a registry key to prevent Automatic Updates and the Windows Update and Microsoft Update sites from offering IE7 as a high-priority update. The Blocker Toolkit and FAQ were released on July 26.
2.
Deploy an update management solution that provides full control over the updates you deploy to computers in your network. Microsoft offers the free Windows Server Update Services and the more advanced Systems Management Server 2003 update management products.
3.
Prevent users from running as local administrators on their computers. Users who are not local administrators will not be offered the update and can be restricted from manually installing IE7
4.
Instruct users to decline IE7 when Automatic Updates notifies them that the update is available for installation. All users will have the ability to decline installation.
Find additional details and screenshots of the notification process on our Web site.

About These Resources from Microsoft
The IE7 Readiness Toolkit provides the following:
Pointer to the latest publicly available build of IE7
Developer checklist, including new features and changes of interest to application and Web developers
Testing guidance and tips for isolating and identifying a particular compatibility problem
Tools for development and testing
Links to resources, technical articles and helpful blog posts
Various methods to provide feedback to Microsoft
The Microsoft Application Compatibility Toolkit 5.0 (ACT 5.0) enables you to test your browser-based applications and ensure that they will work seamlessly with IE7.

This message from Microsoft is an important part of a program, service or product which you or your company purchased or participate in. Legal Information. To sign up for Microsoft newsletters, receive information about our products or services, or review information you've given us, visit the Microsoft.com Web site. This communication was sent by the Microsoft Corporation 1 Microsoft Way Redmond, Washington, USA 98052

Labels: ,

Tuesday, October 10, 2006

Windows XP SP1 support comes to an end

If you've not upgraded to SP2 as of yesterday, you're out of luck.

Labels: ,

Monday, September 11, 2006

FrontPage's Replacement: Expression

Microsoft has released beta 1 of the Microsoft Expression Web Designer, the follow-up to FrontPage. I've installed and played with it a little bit and here's my initial reactions:

Microsoft Expression Web Designer beta 1

The interface is nice and easily understood after about five minutes of poking around. I especially like the ability to split the screen between code and WYSIWYG editing.

Microsoft Expression Web Designer beta 1 - 01

With Microsoft's "we write good clean code now" push, a validator is included in Expression. The validator does allow you to choose which level of "compatibility" you would like to test against.

Microsoft Expression Web Designer beta 1 - 02

The list of validation errors appears below. In this example, since I was validating against XHTML 1.0 Transitional, it did tell me that the legacy FrontPage Webbot in my code may cause problems. Bravo!

Microsoft Expression Web Designer beta 1 - 03

The menu-based CSS editing will take me a bit of getting used to since I'm comfortable writing CSS by hand. I can see this being very useful to someone new to CSS.

Microsoft Expression Web Designer beta 1 - 04

The new "Optimize HTML" feature seems useful but I've not played with it yet.

Microsoft Expression Web Designer beta 1 - 05

Expression's "Preview in Browser" feature is flexible. It auto-detects which browsers are on your computer and you can set up different preview types including multiple browsers in a specific resolution.

Microsoft Expression Web Designer beta 1 - 06

Expression still works with servers that have the FrontPage extensions installed but it doesn't seem to have a built in FTP and/or SFTP client allowing me to easily access sites on non-FrontPage servers. (I've got just one site I work on that is still on a FrontPage server.) I'm not planning on moving from HTML-Kit to Expression until I see what the actual cost will be (or maybe if I get it for free as part of some Office upgrade). Overall though, it does seem to be leaps and bounds ahead FrontPage and Microsoft deserves kudos for this product.

Labels: , ,