Related Links: NLC | Contact | Blogroll | Feed |

 

"You Two! We're at the end of the universe, eh. Right at the edge of knowledge itself. And you're busy... blogging!"
— The Doctor, Utopia


Tuesday, June 07, 2005

Rare books?

When you're a book collector, you always want a "first", i.e. first edition, first printing. But when the publisher has "a first printing of 10.8 million copies" does that really allow the "first" to be worth anything? The first rule of collecting (anything) is scarcity. So, if there's a second printing of (only) 500,000 copies, and therefore more scarce, does that make the second printing more valuable?

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home